The problem is not that the story is inaccurate. The problem is that people don't understand what they are reading. In this case, as it would seem, many digg users were unaware that stars emit radio signals. In fact, natural sources of radio waves fill much of the sky. If you ask me, exaggerated and misleading titles to articles are the problem.
Wayne Smallman
· 1 year ago
I found the Russia Today article first, only finding this article having paid a visit to Mixx.
So it's worth doffing your cap to social bookmarking services this once!
That aside, the Russia Today article just didn't read right. After all, if this was such major news, why would something from earlier in the year only just be emerging now?
Anyway, better than reading headlines about bloody Paris Hilton...
Imshandon
· 1 year ago
What amazes me is people still thank that the media really cares if a story is true or not.....
fisharegood
· 1 year ago
Hate to get to the party late, but i would like to express just how much i detest Russia Today. In terms of sycophantic buffoonery, they make Fox News look like the Utne Reader.
All Comments
JT
www.Ultimate-Anonymity.com
The problem is that people don't understand what they are reading.
In this case, as it would seem, many digg users were unaware that stars emit radio signals.
In fact, natural sources of radio waves fill much of the sky.
If you ask me, exaggerated and misleading titles to articles are the problem.
So it's worth doffing your cap to social bookmarking services this once!
That aside, the Russia Today article just didn't read right. After all, if this was such major news, why would something from earlier in the year only just be emerging now?
Anyway, better than reading headlines about bloody Paris Hilton...