Astroengine.com - Latest Comments in No, An Alien Radio Signal Has Not Been Detected

Re: No, An Alien Radio Signal Has Not Been Detected

fisharegood — Thu, 18 Sep 2008 04:23:56 -0000

Hate to get to the party late, but i would like to express just how much i detest Russia Today. In terms of sycophantic buffoonery, they make Fox News look like the Utne Reader.

Re: No, An Alien Radio Signal Has Not Been Detected

Imshandon — Mon, 18 Aug 2008 20:26:48 -0000

What amazes me is people still thank that the media really cares if a story is true or not.....

Re: No, An Alien Radio Signal Has Not Been Detected

Wayne Smallman — Sat, 16 Aug 2008 04:57:20 -0000

I found the Russia Today article first, only finding this article having paid a visit to Mixx.

So it's worth doffing your cap to social bookmarking services this once!

That aside, the Russia Today article just didn't read right. After all, if this was such major news, why would something from earlier in the year only just be emerging now?

Anyway, better than reading headlines about bloody Paris Hilton...

Re: No, An Alien Radio Signal Has Not Been Detected

Gendou — Fri, 15 Aug 2008 00:03:48 -0000

The problem is not that the story is inaccurate.
The problem is that people don't understand what they are reading.
In this case, as it would seem, many digg users were unaware that stars emit radio signals.
In fact, natural sources of radio waves fill much of the sky.
If you ask me, exaggerated and misleading titles to articles are the problem.

Re: No, An Alien Radio Signal Has Not Been Detected

Jim McDouche — Thu, 14 Aug 2008 17:27:19 -0000

Wow dude, that is quite impressive indeed.

JT
www.Ultimate-Anonymity.com

Re: No, An Alien Radio Signal Has Not Been Detected

lulu — Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:35:33 -0000

NO, "L", you don't "trust" digg, you bury the story if it's inaccurate. dumbass.

Re: No, An Alien Radio Signal Has Not Been Detected

Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:29:33 -0000

That's what happens when you trust digg. You get immediately DUMBER.